This is supplemental reading and study for the article “Obama is not the U.S. President.”
This information should be mailed, linked, hand-delivered or faxed TODAY to every Secretary of State of the Union with a polite demand that Obama be declared ineligible to appear on the ballot in the 2012 election cycle.
More from Devy Kidd:“For those who think Dr. Vieira Jr., Ph.D., J.D., is just some run-of-the-mill attorney, let me give you a very condensed bio: He holds four degrees from Harvard. For more than 30 years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States, he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson and Communications Workers of America v. Beck. His two volume tome, "Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution," is the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective.”
More on quo warranto:
“The prerogative writ of quo warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment, which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents. (“The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” Amendment IX)
http://www.constitution.org/writ/quo_warranto.htm
§ 16-3501. Persons against whom issued; civil action.A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.
§ 16-3502. Parties who may institute; ex rel. proceedings.The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person. The writ may not be issued on the relation of a third person except by leave of the court, to be applied for by the relator, by a petition duly verified setting forth the grounds of the application, or until the relator files a bond with sufficient surety, to be approved by the clerk of the court, in such penalty as the court prescribes, conditioned on the payment by him of all costs incurred in the prosecution of the writ if costs are not recovered from and paid by the defendant.
§ 16-3503. Refusal of Attorney General or United States attorney to act; procedure.If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs. *End*
There are a lot of very intelligent attorneys working on the citizenship issue, so I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens with any remaining legal proceedings still on-going as well as the firestorm I believe will hit with Dr. Jerome Corsi's new book due to be shipped May 17, 2011. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, the challenges to get Obama/Soetoro on state ballots in 2012 is probably going to result in more advanced lawsuits this time around, as well as possibly running up against any new laws passed by states requiring citizenship verification for a presidential candidate. Obama/Soetoro's handlers know it and we know it.
One note in another case:
Hornbeck v. Salazar: New Court Filings Related To Obama's Usurpation Including An Affidavit Regarding Obama's New Forged Birth Certificate
"New court filings related to Obama's usurpation including an affidavit regarding his newly released forged birth certificate. The filings below were submitted on 5/11/2011 in Louisiana in the Hornbeck v. Salazar lawsuit which is regarding Obama's order to shut down offshore oil drilling. If the media did their job we would know what happened at yesterday's oral arguments for this case.
"UPDATE: Via atty. Taitz; Yesterday I had a an oral argument in Hornbeck v Salazar. This case deals with the fact that Obama administration de facto destroyed oil and gas industry in the gulf of Mexico by placing a moratorium and later, when the federal judge placed an injunction on the moratorium, Obama regime continued destroying the oil and gas industry by refusing to grant drilling permits. Most of the rigs left the region and moved to Brazil. Recently Obama visited Brazil and congratulated them on their offshore deep water drilling and stated that US will be their biggest customer, showing him as the most anti-American president this nation ever saw.
"My argument was that the damages suffered in the case at hand were rooted in the same problem: anti-American usurper in the White House, who got there by virtue of fraud and use of a forged birth certificate and invalid Social Security number, issued to another individual in another state."
But, the usurper has committed crimes while in office! Indeed, he has and continues to do so. Knowing he was not eligible to run, the putative president solicited campaign
To impeach would also accomplish this: Every piece of legislation he's signed into law would remain on the books. Let me quote Dr. Vieira one more time: donations to the tune of about $700 million dollars. He can still be indicted for wire fraud.
"Perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy "the Office of President." The Constitution provides that "[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States" (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to a usurper posturing as "the President of the United States," but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no "Bill" will or can, "before it become a Law, be presented to [him]." If no "Bill" is so presented, no "Bill" will or can become a "Law." And any purported "Law" that the usurper "approve[s]" and "sign[s]," or that Congress passes over the usurper's "Objections," will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully "enters office" as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as "President."
Please take the time to read my column on that process. Will he ever be indicted for his crimes? With enough public pressure, it can happen because his handlers would simply throw him under the bus as a liability.
Besides removing a usurper from office, that should be our second-highest consideration and why the outlaw Congress hasn't moved against him. All 535 of them allowed this to happen, and now it's gone so far; they don't have the courage to take on the mess they've made.
The usurper can be indicted once out of office, but how to get him out? There will be a massive push to keep the putative president off the ballot in dozens of states. It will come from candidates who understand the process discussed in my column above.
Mark my words, what's coming will be a nightmare for the DNC and Obama's handlers. Time is running out for them to find another viable candidate; something will have to give. One way or the other, Obama's crimes are going to catch up with him, but please stop working toward setting the wrong legal precedent. It's beyond frustrating, I know, but either we live our words in supporting the U.S. Constitution or we take the wrong road opening the door for another ineligible candidate with enough money and corrupt individuals behind him to seize the office of president.
Of Interest
MAJOR IMPORTANCE…HASTY HAWAII TRIP…WHY REALLY?
http://www.irishufology.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=9097&pid=11640&st=0&%23entry11640
Last night’s a major announcement: Obama is taking a few days to hurry to Hawaii. His grand mother is sick. The media has zero details on this illness or why Obama has to drop his campaign plans and run to Hawaii. This is the latest from Phil on his lawsuit re Obama's birth certificate --- a Hawaiian one. I absolutely wish no ill will towards Obama's grandmother, but it sure it seems like a huge coincidence considering the timing of Phil's release. If I lived in Honolulu where the State Department of Health issues birth certs, I'd be camped out there just to see who shows up in the next few days....maybe Michael Signator.
Details on the Law of Estoppel:
http://www.irishufology.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=9097&pid=11640&st=0&%23entry11640
Pennsylvania attorney Phillip Berg, in his lawsuit (see documents at http://obamacrimes.com/ questioning Barack Hussein Obama's right to become President, filed a request for admissions. In the request, he stated certain allegations and required Obama and the DNC to admit to the truth of them or to deny them within 30 days.
According to the Rules of Civil Procedure, the respondent must answer within the specified time frame or the court will accept the silence of the respondent as acquiescence - an admission of the truth of the allegations. The respondent thereby estops his future protests against the factual nature of the allegations. Unfortunately for the People of America, neither Barack nor the DNC came forward to admit or deny Berg's allegations within the allotted time.
Now we have a constitutional challenge on our hands. Ipso facto, the court must assume Obama and the DNC admitted to the allegations, and it must rule that Obama has no right to pursue the office of President of the United States.
Why? Because these admissions prove that Obama has no right to run for president or become president - they admit that he did not qualify by way of natural born citizenship. Instead of responding to the request for admissions, Barack put his campaign on hold and jetted off to Hawaii to tend to his ailing grandmother. I consider this "coincidence" way too coincidental. I believe he has gone to do damage control - to find some sneaky way to fabricate and/or slip into the system some kind of plausible birth certificate in a criminal effort to prove the US citizenship which he has to this point refused to substantiate by credible documented evidence.
Before you start feeling too sorry for Obama and his supporters, remember that Obama had plenty of opportunity to present proper and certified evidence of his birth. And the public has every right to question his integrity, in light of the sketchy history of his mother's country-hopping and multi-nationalist associations preceding and coinciding with his birth.
In his arrogance, Obama refused to present credible evidence of his birth, and he has tried to get the court challenge dismissed out of hand. If he somehow gets into the presidency, I believe we can expect more of the same recalcitrant deceit and duplicity.
This has NOTHING to do with Obama's politics. It has to do with his obedience to his oath of loyalty to the Constitution for the USA and the laws pursuant thereto.
Law Notes:
1.. Silence constitutes acquiescence and it can equate to fraud for one who has the duty to respond.
2.. Silence constitutes an implied representation of the existence of the state of facts in question and will operate as an estoppel.
3.. "Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading." U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297, 299 (5th Cir. 1977), quoting U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 and Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906).;
4.. "He who is silent when conscience requires him to speak shall be debarred from speaking when conscience requires him to be silent." Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. D. A. Dorsey, 1932.FL.40867, 149 So. 759 (1932).
5.. Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 301 provides for "Admission by silence." Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 8(d), Florida rules of Civil Procedure Rule 1.110(e) and Florida Statute 90.803(6)© maintain that failure to deny constitutes tacit admission.
6..
--- Bob Hurt Berg - DNC Admits Fed Suit Charges - Obama Should Quit By Devy Kidd 10-21-8 For Immediate Release - 10/21/08 For Further Information Contact: Philip J. Berg, Esquire Berg v. Obama 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 No. 08-cv-04083 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.com Obama & DNC Admit All Allegations of Federal Court Lawsuit regarding Obama's "Not" Qualified to be President and Obama Should Immediately Withdraw his Candidacy for President (Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania - 10/21/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama's lack of "qualifications" to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and tbe DNC "ADMITTED", by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is "NOT QUALIFIED" to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate.
The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083. Berg stated that he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008 with a response by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days. No response to the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed "ADMITTED." Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President. The admissions include:
OBAMA - Admitted:
1.. I was born in Kenya.
2.. I am a Kenya "natural born" citizen.
3.. My foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii.
4.. My father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. admitted Paternity of me.
5.. My mother gave birth to me in Mombosa, Kenya.
6.. My mother's maiden name is Stanley Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham.
7.. The COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website "Fightthesmears.com" is a forgery.
8.. I was adopted by a Foreign Citizen.
9.. I was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.
10.. I was not born in Hawaii.
11.. I was not born at the Queens Medical Center in Hawaii.
12.. I was not born at Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Hawaii.
13.. I was not born in a Hospital in Hawaii.
14.. I am a citizen of Indonesia.
15.. I never took the "Oath of Allegiance" to regain my U.S. Citizenship status.
16.. I am not a "natural born" United States citizen.
17.. My date of birth is August 4, 1961.
18.. I traveled to Pakistan in 1981 with my Pakistan friends.
19.. In 1981, I went to Indonesia on my way to Pakistan.
20.. Pakistan was a no travel zone in 1981 for American Citizens.
21.. In 1981, Pakistan was not allowing American Citizens to enter their country.
22.. I traveled on my Indonesian Passport to Pakistan.
23.. I renewed my Indonesian Passport on my way to Pakistan.
24.. My senior campaign staff is aware I am not a "natural born" United States Citizen.
25.. I am proud of my Kenya Heritage.
26.. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.
27.. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.
28.. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth.
29.. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name.
30.. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name.
31.. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth.
32.. The document identified as my Indonesian School record from Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia is genuine.
33.. I went to a Judge in Hawaii to have my name changed.
34.. I went to a Senator and/or Congressman or other public official in Hawaii to have my name changed.
35.. I had a passport issued to me from the Government of Indonesia.
36.. The United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a "natural born" United States citizen.
37.. I am ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or Vice President of the United States.
38.. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Indonesia.
39.. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Kenya.
40.. I am an Attorney who specializes in Constitutional Law.
41.. Kenya was a part of the British Colonies at the time of my birth. 42.. Kenya did not become its own Republic until 1963.
43.. I am not a "Naturalized" United States Citizen.
44.. I obtained $200 Million dollars in campaign funds by fraudulent means.
45.. I cannot produce a "vault" (original) long version of a birth certificate showing my birth in Hawaii.
46.. My "vault" (original) long version birth certificate shows my birth in Kenya.
47.. The only times I was to a Hospital in Hawaii was for check-ups or medical treatments for illnesses.
48.. Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.
49.. Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.
50.. I was born in the Coast Province Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
51.. I represented on my State Bar application in Illinois that I never used any other name other than Barack Hussein Obama.
52.. I went by the name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia.
53.. My Indonesian school records are under the name of Barry Soetoro.
54.. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when admitted to the State Bar of Illinois to practice Law.
55.. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when I was Sworn into my United States Senate Office.
56.. I hold dual citizenship with at least one other Country besides the United States of America.
DNC - Admitted:
1.. The DNC nominated Barrack Hussein Obama as the Democratic Nominee for President.
2.. The DNC has not vetted Barrack Hussein Obama.
3.. The DNC did not have a background check performed on Barrack Hussein Obama.
4.. The DNC did not verify Barrack Hussein Obama's eligibility to serve as President of the United States.
5.. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya.
6.. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born" United States citizen.
7.. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was not born in Hawaii.
8.. The DNC admits they have not inquired into Barrack Hussein Obama's citizenship status.
9.. The DNC admits they have a duty to properly vette the Democratic Nominee for President.
10.. The DNC admits Lolo Soetoro, M.A., an Indonesian citizen adopted Barrack Hussein Obama.
11.. The DNC admits the Credentials Committee has been aware of this lawsuit since August 22, 2008 as the lawsuit was faxed to our Washington D.C. Office on August 22, 2008.
12.. The DNC admits their Credentials Committee failed to verify and/or inquire into the credentials of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as the President of the United States.
13.. The DNC admits their Credential Committee's Report failed to address the issues of Barack Hussein Obama's ineligibility to serve as President of the United States.
14.. The DNC admits Howard Dean, Chair Person has and had knowledge Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya and ineligible to serve as the President of the United States.
15.. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all Democratic citizens of the United States have been personally injured as a result of not having a qualified Democratic Presidential Nominee to cast their votes upon.
16.. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional Right to vote for the President of the United States and to have two (2) qualified candidates of which to choose from.
17.. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional right to have a properly vetted Democratic Presidential Nominee of which to cast their vote.
18.. The DNC admits an FBI background check is not performed on the Presidential or Vice Presidential Candidates.
19.. The DNC admits the United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a "natural born" United States citizen.
20.. The DNC admits they collected donations on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama for his Presidential campaign.
21.. The DNC admits Plaintiff and Democratic citizens donated money based on false representations that Barack Hussein Obama was qualified to serve as the President of the United States.
22.. The DNC admits if Barack Hussein Obama is elected as President and allowed to serve as President of the United States in violation of our Constitution, it will create a Constitutional crisis.
23.. The DNC admits Barack Hussein Obama took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution.
24..DNC admits allowing a person who is not a "natural born" citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff's rights to due process of law in violation of the United States Constitution. 25.. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a "natural born" citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff's rights to Equal Protection of the laws in violation of the United States Constitution. 26.. The DNC admits the function of the DNC is to secure a Democratic Presidential Candidate who will protect Democratic citizen's interests, fight for their equal opportunities and fight for justice for all Americans.
27.. The DNC admits the Democratic National Committee has been promoting Barack Hussein Obama's Presidential election knowing he was ineligible to serve as President of the United States. Our website obamacrimes.com now has 50.7 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website - and forward to your local newspapers, radio and TV stations. Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, "we" the people, are heading to a "Constitutional Crisis" if this case is not resolved forthwith. * * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to http://en.wikipedia...._for_admissions http://obamacrimes.com
This information should be mailed, linked, hand-delivered or faxed TODAY to every Secretary of State of the Union with a polite demand that Obama be declared ineligible to appear on the ballot in the 2012 election cycle. If you have a radio show, I hope you will air this press release. FAX it to your state rep and state senator. FAX it to your local county clerk with a short letter letting him/her know Obama cannot be an eligible candidate on election day because - include the legal definiton of 'request for admissions.' I will do mine this morning. If we the people flood all of the above -- by the MILLIONS - we can make the volanco erupt and the hell with FAUX News and all the rest. Phil has done all this work, we need to back up his efforts. We can get Obama off the ballot.
For those of you who don't what Request for Admissions means in Phil's press release: http://www.nolo.com/definition.cfm/Term/E9...A3FBA39DF0E60C5 D/alpha/R/ request for admission - A discovery procedure, authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court rules of many states, in which one party asks an opposing party to admit that certain facts are true. If the opponent admits the facts or fails to respond in a timely manner, the facts will be deemed true for purposes of trial. A request for admission is called a "request to admit" in many states.
